Girls necessary afterall

At the risk of reducing a complex cultural, historical and political issue to the merely biological… did this little fact of life not occur to anyone? My mother sends the following item from the latest not-accessible-by-internet “Women’s Network News” (edited and published by Rachel Conrad Wahlberg, 5804 Cary Dr., Austin, TX 78757; this story reprinted from: NY Times International, Jan. 31, 2005 )…

“Everyone knows about the one-child policy in China. Its purpose was to limit the population – which is now 1.3 billion people.

For years many families have been using prenatal scans and selective abortions to make certain that the child is a boy – not only for his labor, but tradition holds that a son must care for his parents. A son is often compared to a pension.

Demographers predict that in a few decades China could have up to 40 million men unable to find mates.

But now – there is such a glut of boys – roughly 134 for every 100 girls – that the Chinese government is having second thoughts. It has decided to pay families who already have girls.

Some schools now have a Care for Girls program. Now there are billboards promoting the latest propaganda campaign – RESPECT GIRLS. A school official explains the program is supposed to build the self-esteem of girls.

In one rural community the pressure for sons had been so enormous that one mother, Liao Yanquing, said that she contemplated suicide because her second baby was another girl.

Now, she and her family have received a government grant – money they have used to buy a new house and a small restaurant. And both girls go to school free.

“It’s been quite a dramatic change,” she said.


4 thoughts on “Girls necessary afterall

Add yours

  1. You know, I always secretly suspected.

    Cool blog. I’ve hit the “Next Blog” button about forty-two times in a row at this point, with an average pause time of approximately 0.87 seconds. Yours was the first that I felt moved to stop and actually read. (And here I was, about to give up.)

    Anyway, I, too, will go on record as being in favor of girls.

  2. Interesting ideas to play with here: changing gender demographics and their consequences for cultural institions like marriage, could lead to different forms of marriage [for esample, as described in Muslim sharia'(up to 40 different types!)]. Or, with rapid modernization in China, the employment status of women may change so that they too could support parents in old age. Changing statuses and roles I think are more a function of the interplay of social forces and I think by now we all know that customs and institutions are maleable and adaptive responsive (certainly in the long run) to all kinds of changes. {If only the “fundamentalists” could finally understand this}. Keep up the good reporting and commenting. Thanks, MizM. Sir Real (who will post on MetaThink again soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: